Prognostic factors for discharge to home and residing at home 12 months after hip fracture: an Anoia hip study.

OBJECTIVES: Hip fracture is often associated with loss of physical function and institutionalization. The aim of this study is to describe the prognostic factors for discharge to home and residing there 12 months after a hip fracture. METHODS: A prospective study that includes patients aged ≥ 69 years that live at home before the fracture, admitted from June 1st, 2010, to May 31st, 2013. We registered the demographic data, presurgical function and cognitive assessment, surgical waiting time, type of fracture and complications during hospitalization. RESULTS: We included 273 patients (mean age 84.8 ± 6.1 years; 80% women), 130 (47.6%) were discharged directly to their own home. The predictors of discharge to home were a lower Geriatrics Dementia Scale score (OR 1.42; 95% CI 1.17-1.71; p < 0.001), a higher Barthel Index score at discharge (OR 1.07; 95% CI 1.05-1.10; p < 0.001) and a longer hospital stay (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.02-1.27; p = 0.019). At 12 months, 169 (63.5%) were still residing at home. Predictors of residing at home 12 months after the hip fracture were age (OR 1.07; 95% CI 1.02-1.12; p = 0.010), the discharge Barthel Index score (OR 0.96; 95% CI 0.94-0.98; p < 0.001), the Geriatrics Dementia Scale score (OR 1.27; 95% CI 1.05-1.52; p = 0.013), the surgical waiting time (OR 3.42; 95% CI 1.077-10.89; p = 0.037) and Charlson comorbidity index (OR 1.27; 95% CI 1.05-1.55; p = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Prognostic factors for discharging to home and remaining there 12 months after a hip fracture are those that reflect a better health condition prior to the fracture and better functionality at the hospital discharge for hip fracture.

Mejorando la atención del paciente mayor ingresado por fractura de cadera. ¿Hemos de avanzar? / Improving the care of the elderly patient admitted for hip fracture. Should we move forward?

No disponible

Advantages of care for patients with hip fractures in the acute geriatric unit: Hip study Anoia.

AIM: Hip fracture as a result of bone fragility is characterized by poor health outcomes in the medium and long term. Our goal was to compare a new orthogeriatric model with the old trauma model and evaluate improvements in clinical management. METHODS: We carried out a comparative unicentric study, a historical sample (trauma model) collected from 1 June 2007 to 31 May 2010, versus a prospective sample (orthogeriatric model) collected from 1 June 2010 until 31 May 2013. We included all patients aged >69 years with hip fracture as a result of bone fragility. RESULTS: A total of 792 patients were evaluated (mean age 84.3 years). The surgical waiting period went from 2.70 days in the trauma model to 1.86 days in the orthogeriatric model (P < 0.001); the average stay was 15.76 days in the trauma model, and for the orthogeriatric model was reduced to 5.90 days (P < 0.001); mortality went from 4.5% to 1.3% (P ≤ 0.010); 1 month readmission for hip dislocation was reduced from 2.3% to 0.5% (P = 0.032). After a 6-month follow up, we had 302 trauma model patients and 287 orthogeriatric model patients. After 1 year, we had 288 patients in the trauma model and 264 patients in the orthogeriatric model. The main cause of abandonment was death, 108 patients (27.3%) in the trauma model and 100 patients (27.5%) in the orthogeriatric model (P = 0.951). CONCLUSIONS: When we compared the two models, we found statistically significant better results in the preoperative waiting period, average stay, hospital mortality and 1 month readmission as a result of hip prosthesis luxation in favor of the orthogeriatric model. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2018; 18: 407-414.